From 2013 via 2015, the mainland Chinese and Hong Kong tabloid press latched onto a narrative a few double murder. Henry Cheung and his good friend Angus Tse had been accused of murdering, dismembering, after which microwaving Cheung’s mother and father. The media frenzy surrounding Cheung and Tse was not with out precedent, thanks partly to a spate of lurid ripped-from-the-headlines potboilers that had been, within the early Nineties, a staple of pre-handover Hong Kong cinema.
“The Sparring Accomplice,” a pulpy and engrossing courtroom thriller primarily based on Cheung and Tse’s case, looks like a throwback to these earlier Class III films. It even shares the identical Cat III ranking that, in Hong Kong, comes with sure tropes and generic expectations, beginning with express violence and softcore intercourse. (For extra background data on Class III films, take a look at my six-part Fangoria column, “A Guide to Hong Kong Category III Shockers”). Cheung and Tse are best topics for a Class III thriller since these films use established procedural tropes to pander to HongKongers’ barely suppressed traumas and neuroses.
In “The Sparring Partner,” the sadistic Henry (Yeung Wai-leun) is accused of conspiring to kill his mother and father together with his slovenly good friend Angus (Mak Pui-tung). Many of the film represents their courtroom trial via interviews carried out each in and outdoors of courtroom. Henry’s guilt appears to be assured, given his unbothered physique language and unrepentant testimony. His motives additionally appear clear: he may need achieved it for his mother and father’ actual property, as a result of he was jealous of his older brother, or perhaps due to his sociopathic admiration for Hitler. Henry’s delusional is what I’m saying, and all people, together with his trial’s 9 jurors—two greater than common—already appear to know who he’s.
Angus isn’t as simple to pathologize. The proof towards him is flimsy, and his psychological and emotional intelligence is commonly questioned. Nevertheless, many hints all through “The Sparring Partner” counsel that the phrases by which Angus and Henry had been judged are finally insufficient. As a result of Angus was overwhelmed and compelled to submit a confession by the Hong Kong police. The jurors puzzle over him, however most appear satisfied by his testimony’s anecdotal particulars. Angus usually yells, and his speech is infantile, however he has a solution for every thing, like why did he attempt to patch the holes in his lavatory (vermin infestation) or why did he permit some types of proof for use towards him (police brutality). Henry insists that he didn’t make Angus do something he didn’t need to. He may be proper.
Finally, “The Sparring Accomplice” burrows deeper into the tics and developments of earlier Hong Kong trial thrillers like “Stays of a Girl” and “The Final Judgement,” each of which dramatized the identical real-life homicide trial. In that case, a married couple was implicated in a drug-fueled murder, which they then coated up by dismembering, dissolving, and storing their sufferer’s physique in a steel container stuffed with acid. “The Ultimate Judgement” and “Stays of a Girl” are about girls who can not face the reality about their respective companions. “The Sparring Accomplice” is extra in regards to the culpability and partiality of a jury of Hong Kong residents, a few of whom have examine this case within the tabloids, regardless of being informed they need to not.
Primarily based on trial interviews, most jurors assume that they know who’s responsible. Later in the movie, the jury’s deliberation is interrupted by a dramatic re-enactment that appears to come back out of nowhere. In the midst of their discussions, they see Henry attacking and killing his mother and father. The brutal violence of this inexplicable, magically sensible scene is disturbing, but it surely solely ruffles the jurors’ feathers for a second. They gasp and carp to one another. After that, it’s again to a low drone of annoyance and the comfy presumption of Angus’s innocence.
“The Sparring Partner” factors a slippery finger at its viewers, their topics’ legal professionals, kinfolk, and inevitably the perpetrators themselves. In fact, we’ve already seen this story within the alarmist press and sensationalist films. Nonetheless, does that familiarity breed a simple type of contempt? Is Henry his brother’s keeper, or is that only a tempting story?
The makers of “The Sparring Accomplice” appear to be relying on viewers’ built-in fascination with their doomed protagonists. They don’t look down on viewers with chin-stroking contempt however moderately from inside the cracks and gaps they jam into this over-ripe story. That is nonetheless a misanthropic Class III film, so judgment is predictably utilized with scattergun precision. But you don’t need to be a trenchcoat-clad aficionado for that to matter. “The Sparring Accomplice” leaves a mark as a result of it’s compelling as each a mannequin instance and a bitter auto-critique.